Why fashion people unnecessarily dropped the 'S' from the ground?

  "Let's couple that look with a red shoe", "This will work with pants", "I want to see with a naked lip." What the hell has happened to several fashionable? When is it suddenly a singular sensation?

Those who work in the fashion apparently always had their own island, evolving language that was tasteless and hilarious. But thanks to the success of the reality TV star stylists like Rachel Zoe and Brad Goreski, the general public has become familiar with it, frankly, an embarrassing degree. (Does anyone bother opportunity for those abbreviate "big" to "move"?)

By their nature, fashion is influential, so when the words coined a new garment skirt shorts, jeggings, etc. describe it is not uncommon for there to get absorbed into the lexicon real world. But popularize portmanteaus is one thing, change existing words is another. For some time, the industry is down the "s" in words, turning "jeans" to "John", "lips" to "lip", "pants" to "panties" and more obvious of all - "Pants" in " pants ". (And in all the kinds of "shoe", were the words to "stable", "army", "platform" for short).

And it is not just high fashion. This has trickled down to the mall. The gap is now referring to "short" or "short". I do not know short you. My question is: why?

Rachel Braier The Guardian suggests that there is a "less is more" is:

    Is this the shape while soft curves of the letter S offense these gurus rail-thin style? Will they start with other letters to his place? Maybe K or Z with their bold, angular lines to a fashionable choice.

She is half in jest, but it seems plausible because it there is at least some truth to the idea that the subconscious of some clever way plural "large" and "more" is not as fancy as "small". I know this sounds stupid, but if not, to "pants" as "panties". This is stupid, it is only logical that the etymology is good.