2012年6月19日星期二

Louis Vuitton case against Warner Bros. 'The Hangover II rejected "by Federal Judge

  If the fashion house Louis Vuitton to Warner Bros. was not in the bag after all.

A federal judge Friday threw French label continuation during a knockoff bag in a scene in the

2011 studio version uses "The Hangover. Part II," The design house, said the scene was 25 seconds

hurt his brand identity.

In the scene, told Zach Galifianakis, Ed Helms Alan Stu to be careful with your bags, because

"it's a Louis Vuitton," say the silent "s" in the name of the designer.

But Louis Vuitton did not find it funny, and stop a lawsuit in December last year, with its

millions of unspecified damages and injunctions to the further spread of the movie until the

scene is being processed. The fashion house as a bag used for the stage - made by the Chinese

company Diophy American - would confuse consumers.

U.S. District Court Judge Andrew Carter disagreed, saying that the claims are not against the

First Amendment, according to The Hollywood Reporter.

He then even better, the analysis of the humor of the film for the court.

"Laconian Note Alan Teddy '[his] attention" because their Vuitton bag is a Lewis appears to be a

snob just because the public does Louis Vuitton - in which the bag Diophy seems confusing - with

luxury and high society lifestyle, "Carter wrote in his decision.

"His comment is so funny because he's French incorrectly pronounce" Louis "as the English" Lewis,

"and ironically, because he can not correctly pronounce the brand name of one of their

characteristics expensive, also awkwardly to the image of Alan as a socially and ill-informed

comic book character. "





没有评论:

发表评论